Justice is the key, and correctness is the standard between movement, movements, and mobilization. Captain Mohamed Hassal-Tahir

Date: June 2026.3

Movement in its general meaning is a transition or change from one state to another. In the humanities and political sciences, this concept can be applied to social and political changes by studying all types of movement—whether spontaneous, voluntary, or reflexive. We find that:Spontaneous movement occurs without prior planning, such as spontaneous popular uprisings.Voluntary movement results from a conscious decision, like the establishment of a political organization or party.Reflexive movement emerges as a direct reaction to an event or external pressure, such as resisting coups or interventions.In Sudan, these three types manifest in a turbulent political reality where popular will overlaps with violent reactions, and sometimes with unorganized spontaneous movements. Each derives legitimacy from the prevailing status quo, aligning with one form of legitimacy or another in its own space and time. This is why most political parties and organizations are named after “movement,” such as:The Popular Movement, which arose as a political and military force demanding rights and justice, influencing the state through peace agreements and eventual secession.The Islamic Movement, which was tied to power for decades and introduced Sudan to ideological governance, according to knowledge encyclopedias.Armed Movements, which appeared as a reaction to marginalization and injustice, prolonging internal conflicts. ⚡This raises a logical question: Is mobilization and armed movements a sign of health or illness?Since life itself is tied to movement—even though human health is subject to illness—we find that:Political mobilization can be a healthy sign if it expresses public awareness and a desire for reform.But when it turns into warring armed movements, it becomes closer to a pathological condition that threatens the unity and stability of the state.A healthy condition requires mobilization to be peaceful, opening the door to reform and justice.

A pathological condition unfolds when expression turns into bloody conflict, weakening the state and increasing the suffering of the people. 🌍Decision-makers and opinion leaders must dismantle the causes of these patterns by examining the foundational narratives of each healthy or pathological case, and by adopting approaches that preserve the body of the state. Feelings of injustice and marginalization, absence of justice in the distribution of power and wealth, lack of good governance, elite dominance over political decisions, and foreign interventions—all fuel conflicts by supporting different sides. As the saying goes, “If the cause is known, the wonder ceases.” Solutions therefore emerge from the key word:⚖️ Justice is the foundation of governance.Justice is the key, and correctness is the standard. To overcome Sudan’s crisis, we must:Establish justice through independent judicial institutions.Share power by involving all components in governance.Ensure balanced development by fairly distributing resources among regions.Adopt national dialogue as an alternative to weapons, paving the way for comprehensive reconciliation.

✍️ Thus, Sudanese politics today lives between:Movement as a natural dynamic,Movements as conflicting organizations,Mobilization as a popular outcry.The solution lies in transforming these energies from conflict into construction, under the umbrella of justice—the foundation of governance. What unites them is the derivation of the name from the essence, inseparable from it. And God is the ultimate guide to the right path.