Politics Between Colloquial Language and Standard Language Captain Mohamed Hassan Al-Tahir

Date: April 9, 2026
🔹 Language is the tool of expression and communication. Through it, humans convey their thoughts and shape their vision of the world. It is not merely words, but a system of symbols and meanings that:
– Define the identity of the individual and the community,
– Build bridges of understanding among people through a shared tongue.
🔹 Standard language is the disciplined formulation that adheres to rules and avoids emotional excess or randomness. It is the language of institutions, laws, and official discourse, while colloquial language is more spontaneous and emotional. Their relationship is like that of a river to a dam’s channel:
– The first springs from popular experience,
– The second regulates it to be suitable for circulation in the public and political sphere.
🔹 Language reveals the mind of its speaker. A word may elevate its owner to the rank of wisdom or drag him down to ridicule:
– He who chooses his words well proves the soundness of his mind,
– He who lets his tongue loose without restraint may be counted rude rather than eloquent.
🔹 Prophets were granted concise speech—few words carrying great meanings, refining souls and opening doors of guidance. In contrast, the language of blind imitation—“We found our fathers upon a creed”—reflects intellectual stagnation, where reason disappears and is replaced by unconscious following.
🔹 The tongue is the tool, and language is the content. It may be:
– The tongue eloquent but the language poor,
– The language rich but the tongue unable to convey it.
Balance between them creates influential discourse in politics and society. From here arises the question:
🔹 Are there languages more polite?
The answer is yes. Some languages inherently contain terms of courtesy and respect, presenting kind words as a means of resolving crises. In politics, polite standard language can rebuild trust and open pathways for dialogue instead of confrontation.
By default:
– Colloquial language leans toward emotion.
By definition:
– Standard language regulates meaning and clarifies intent.
By design:
– Polite language is built to be a tool of peace and dialogue.
🔹 Thus, the discerning listener can evaluate the soundness of intellect through the eloquence of language and the rudeness of the tongue. Politics is a field of speech before action, where wisdom appears in balanced discourse that weighs interest against justice. Meanwhile, rudeness of speech exposes weak argument and lack of vision. The relationship between language and politics is decisive: a word can topple a government or save a nation, resolve a crisis or ignite a war. This demands that words be disciplined in standard language, expressing sound reason rather than serving as tools of vulgar speech.
🔹 Hence, standard language is not merely rules but a measure of the integrity of heart and mind. When speech is good, outcomes are sound, for truthful words spring from a pure heart and translate into wise political action.
✍️ In conclusion, politics is a battle between impulse and balance, between emotion and reason, between rudeness and courtesy. Whoever champions standard language, in truth, champions sound reason, purity of heart, and the integrity of results.


